ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KLAIM NINE DASH LINE TIONGKOK ATAS LAUT CHINA SELATAN DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNCLOS 1982
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65244/jcp.v2i1.548Keywords:
Nine dash line, Laut China Selatan, UNCLOS 1982, Penyelesaian SengketaAbstract
Sengketa Laut China Selatan menimbulkan persoalan hukum internasional akibat klaim sepihak nine dash line oleh Tiongkok yang tumpang tindih dengan rezim hukum laut internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum klaim nine dash line ditinjau berdasarkan ketentuan United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 serta mengkaji mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa Laut China Selatan melalui hukum internasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, khususnya terhadap UNCLOS 1982 dan Putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) tahun 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa klaim nine dash line tidak memiliki dasar hukum dan bertentangan dengan ketentuan UNCLOS 1982, serta bahwa mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang diatur dalam UNCLOS telah tersedia secara normatif namun menghadapi keterbatasan dalam penerapannya akibat ketergantungan pada kepatuhan negara.
Downloads
References
Buku
Asikin. Pendekatan Metodologi Penelitian dalam Hukum. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2011.
Beckman, Robert. The South China Sea Disputes: International Legal Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Cet. 3. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2021.
Jackson, Robert. Classical Sovereignty in a Globalized World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Kraska, James. Maritime Power and the Law of the Sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Mahfud MD. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2006.
Marzuki, Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
Merrills, J. G. International Dispute Settlement. 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Rothwell, Donald R., Tim Stephens. The International Law of the Sea. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023.
Sassen, Saskia. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
Skinner, Quentin. Bodin on Sovereignty Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Cet. 17. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2020.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 15. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
Tanaka, Yoshifumi. The International Law of the Sea. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Permanent Court of Arbitration. The South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China), Award, 12 July 2016.
United Nations. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 1982.
Jurnal, Artikel, dan Website
Beckman, Robert, Leonard Bernard. “Managing Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea.” Asian Journal of International Law 12, no. 2 (2022).
Beckman, Robert, Leonard Bernard. “The ASEAN–China Code of Conduct and the South China Sea.” Asian Journal of International Law, 2022.
Beckman, Robert. “The Philippines v. China Case and the Future of the South China Sea Disputes.” Asian Journal of International Law, 2021.
Beckman, Robert. “The South China Sea and the UNCLOS Regime.” Asian Journal of International Law 11, no. 2 (2021).
Beckman, Robert. “The South China Sea Arbitration and the Limits of Historic Rights.” Asian Journal of International Law 10, no. 2 (2020).
Guilfoyle, Douglas. “The Rule of Law and Maritime Security in Asia.” Asian Journal of International Law 12 (2022).
Guzzini, Stefano. “Sovereignty in Crisis: Power, Politics and the State.” International Relations 35, no. 2 (2021).
Juwana, Hikmahanto. “Indonesia dan Sengketa Laut China Selatan.” Jurnal Hukum Internasional 13, no. 2 (2016).
Ku, Julian, dan Chris Mirasola. “The South China Sea and the Limits of International Law.” International Law Studies 97 (2021).
McLaughlin, Robert. “Enforcement of Decisions under the Law of the Sea Convention.” Ocean Development & International Law 52 (2021).
Schofield, Clive, dan Ian Storey. “The South China Sea Dispute: Increasing Stakes and Rising Tensions.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 43, no. 1 (2021).
Schofield, Clive, et al. “Maritime Claims and the Limits of UNCLOS.” Ocean Development & International Law 52, no. 4 (2021).
Schofield, Clive. “The South China Sea Arbitration: Cartographic Claims and UNCLOS.” Ocean Development & International Law 52, no. 3 (2021).
Schofield, Clive. “What’s at Stake in the South China Sea?” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 31, no. 2 (2016).
Stachy, Hellen. “Relational Sovereignty and the Global Governance Dilemma.” Journal of International Political Theory 14, no. 3 (2018).
Stachy, Hellen. “Relational Sovereignty Revisited: Law, Power and Compliance.” Journal of International Political Theory 18, no. 3 (2022).
Stachy, Hellen. “Sovereignty Beyond Absolutism.” Global Constitutionalism 10, no. 2 (2021).
Talmon, Stefan. “The South China Sea Arbitration: Is the Award Enforceable?” Chinese Journal of International Law 15 (2017).
Tanaka, Yoshifumi. “Dispute Settlement under UNCLOS: Still Fit for Purpose?” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 36 (2021)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eklesia E. N. Tendean, Adensi Timomor, Hendrasari B. R. Rawung (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Constitutional Principles agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Constitutional Principles right of first publication with the work simultaneously This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
