Comparative Study of Solar Still Technology and Conventional Methods for Salt Production on the South Coast of Sukabumi

Authors

  • Amma Muliya Romadoni Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65244/jggengineering.v2i2.1187

Keywords:

Solar Still, Conventional Method, South Sukabumi Coast, Technology Comparison

Abstract

The development of salt production on the South Coast of Sukabumi faces distinct geographical and hydrometeorological challenges, including cliff topography, limited flat land, high waves, as well as fluctuating humidity and rainfall. This study aims to provide a general comparative evaluation between closed solar still technology and traditional open solar evaporation methods for salt production in this region. The comparative analysis reveals that solar still technology offers key advantages, including significantly higher thermal efficiency compared than conventional methods, complete protection against rainwater dilution and external contamination, and the ability to simultaneously produce high-purity salt and desalinated fresh water. Furthermore, the modular design of solar stills eliminates the need for extensive flat land, making it well-suited for South Sukabumi's rugged coastal terrain. Conversely, the main limitations of solar still technology lie in its higher initial capital investment for composite panel materials and system components, alongside the necessity for modular scaling to achieve high-volume production. Overall, solar still technology provides a more technically viable and climate-resilient alternative to conventional open evaporation in southern coastal environments, driving salt center diversification beyond the traditional Pantura region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaian, W. M., Elnegiry, E. A., & Hamed, A. M. (2016). Experimental investigation on the performance of solar still augmented with pin-finned absorber plate. Desalination, 379, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.10.007

Arunkumar, T., Jayaprakash, R., Ahsan, A., Denkenberger, D., & Okundamiya, M. S. (2016). Effect of water losses on the performance of a solar still. Desalination, 380, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.022

Hansen, R. S., Narayanan, C. S., & Murugavel, K. K. (2018). Performance analysis on modified solar still with different flat plate absorbers and stepped absorbers. Desalination, 442, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.05.011

Kabeel, A. E., & Abdelgaied, M. (2016). Improving the performance of solar still by using PCM as a thermal energy storage medium. Energy Conversion and Management, 112, 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.050

Kabeel, A. E., Hamed, A. M., El-Agouz, S. A., & Abdelgaied, M. (2018). Performance enhancement of a solar still using tubular absorber and phase change material. Desalination, 428, 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.029

Kumar, A., Prakash, O., & Kaviti, A. K. (2022). Comprehensive review on performance enhancement of solar stills using stepped absorber plates and phase change materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(15), 21340–21362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17855-y

Modi, K. V., & Modi, D. L. (2019). Performance evaluation of double basin single slope solar still with and without thermal energy storage material. Solar Energy, 188, 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.059

Omara, Z. M., Kabeel, A. E., & Younes, M. M. (2017). Enhancing the productivity of solar stills using different techniques: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 846–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.075

Panchal, H. N., & Patel, S. (2017). An extensive review on different design concepts of solar still. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 38(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2015.1136364

Panchal, H., Sathyamurthy, R., Kabeel, A. E., Patel, S. K., & Arunkumar, T. (2021). Annual performance analysis of single-slope solar still with sand-filled basin: A comparative study. Applied Water Science, 11(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01362-5

Parsa, S. M., Rahbar, N., Cole, P. J., & Javadi, D. (2021). Fresh water and salt co-production using a novel solar distillation system: Experimental and economic evaluation. Desalination, 518, 115282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115282

Rabhi, K., Raach, H., Ben Brahim, A., & Ben Bacha, H. (2020). Experimental study of a modified solar still integrated with a condenser and pin fins absorber. Desalination, 491, 114561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114561

Sharon, H., & Reddy, K. S. (2018). A review of solar energy-driven desalination technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 4088–4118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.076

Sharshir, S. W., Peng, G., Wu, L., Yang, N., Kabeel, A. E., Zang, J., & Khedr, M. A. (2017). Enhancing the solar still performance using nanofluids and glass cover cooling: Experimental and economic study. Energy Conversion and Management, 148, 1470–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.084

Suraparaju, S. K., & Natarajan, S. K. (2020). A detailed review on solar still integrated with phase change materials for freshwater production. Journal of Energy Storage, 32, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.101899

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Comparative Study of Solar Still Technology and Conventional Methods for Salt Production on the South Coast of Sukabumi. (2026). Journal of Golden Generation Engineering, 2(2), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.65244/jggengineering.v2i2.1187

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.