THE AUTHORITY OF A NOTARIAL DEED COPY THAT UNDERTAKES CORRECTIONS DUE TO WRITING AND/OR TYPING ERRORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65244/jggls.v2i1.98Keywords:
Copy, Deed, NotaryAbstract
The ambiguity of the norms in Article 51 of the Law raises issues regarding the validity of copies of corrected deeds and the liability of Notaries towards the parties involved. This study aims to analyze the legal status of the corrected deed copies and the forms of Notaries' responsibility for errors that occur. The research method used is normative juridical legal research with legislative and conceptual approaches, through descriptive qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. Research findings indicate that corrections to copies of deeds remain valid and equivalent to the deed minutes as long as the errors are administrative in nature and the corrections are made in accordance with regulations, so they do not alter the substance of the deed. However, if corrections are made not in accordance with the UUJN procedures or result in substantial differences with the minutes, then the copy of the deed may be downgraded to a private deed and categorized as a legally defective deed. Notaries are liable in civil, administrative, criminal, and ethical terms, because such negligence constitutes an unlawful act under the concept of liability. In conclusion, corrections to deed copies remain valid as long as they do not change the substance and are carried out according to procedure, while Notaries are obliged to bear legal responsibility for any typing or writing errors arising from their negligence.
Downloads
References
Ardianta, I. G. M., Munandar, A., & Djumardin, D. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Hak Ingkar Notaris Terhadap Kerahasiaan Isi Minuta Akta Notaris Berdasarkan Uujnp Dan Kode Etik Notaris. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i2.150
Azheri, B. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: Dari voluntary menjadi mandatory.
Darus, M. L. H. (2017). Hukum Notariat dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. UII Perss, Yogyakarta.
Diantha, I. M. P. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media.
Dyani, V. A. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Membuat Party Acte. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss1.art11
Fatriansyah, F. (2023). Peran Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Dan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terhadap Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i2.370
Kie, T. T. (2000). Studi Notariat Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris. Ichtiar Baru.
Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi), PT. Adhitya Andrebina Agung, Jakarta.
Mertokusumo, S. (1986). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. (No Title).
Repinta, N. K. A. C., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Agung, A. A. I. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembetulan Kesalahan Tulis Atau Ketik Yang Terdapat Pada Akta Yang Telah Ditandatangani. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 6(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.6.2.2025.233-238
Ridwan, H. R. (2016). Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Satya Wibowo, W., Najwan, J., & Abu Bakar, F. (2022). Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Recital Review, 4(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861
Soekanto, S. (1976). Beberapa permasalahan hukum dalam kerangka pembangunan di Indonesia. Yayasan Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Taliwongso, C. A. A. (2022). Kedudukan Akta Otentik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perdata Di Tinjau Dari Pasal 1870 KUH Perdata (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 347/Pdt. G/2012/PN. Mdn). Lex Administratum, 10(2).
Yustika Barito, I. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA NOTARIS DALAM PROSES PEMBUATAN AKTA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN KESAKSIAN PALSU. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(4), 472. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.286
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science right of first publication with the work simultaneously This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
